Technician performing a thermographic inspection of an open electrical panel, thermal camera aimed at the busbars.

What infrared thermography is

Infrared thermography uses a thermal camera to measure the radiation emitted by a component's surface and display it as a temperature image. In predictive maintenance it finds hot spots (loose connections, bearings with friction, degraded insulation) before they become failures, without contact and while the machine is running.

The value is not in the colorful image but in the comparison: a spot is an anomaly only when it is hotter than it should be relative to an identical component under the same load.

Visual map of thermography in maintenance

The map shows the camera settings, the load correction, the severity table and the panel example.

INFRARED THERMOGRAPHY
Visual map 251: Infrared Thermography in Predictive Maintenance: How to Apply It. Click the map to see it full size.Download the map as PNG

How to measure correctly

The camera measures radiation, and converting it to temperature depends on settings. Get them wrong and you get a nice-looking wrong number:

One example shows how much emissivity matters. A surface at 80 °C with a true ε of 0.70, read with the camera set to 0.95, appears at about 54 °C (simplified calculation, ignoring reflection): an error of roughly 26 °C low.

Delta T and severity

The most common criterion compares the suspect spot with a reference:

ΔT = T of hot spot − T of reference (identical component, same load)

In three-phase panels, the reference is the average of the other two phases. With no identical component, compare with ambient temperature or the manufacturer's limit. A typical classification (reference values in the style of NETA specifications; your company should fix the limits in its own procedure):

ΔT over similar componentSeverityAction
1 to 3 °CPossible deficiencyRecord and reinspect on the next route
4 to 15 °CProbable deficiencyRepair at the next planned shutdown
Above 15 °CMajorRepair as soon as safely possible

The component's absolute limit (insulation, seal, grease) always applies, regardless of ΔT.

Advertisement

Load correction

Power dissipated in a resistive connection grows with the square of the current (P = I² × R). A connection showing 8.5 °C at 60% load will run much hotter at full load. Estimate:

Corrected ΔT = measured ΔT × (rated I ÷ measured I)²

It is an estimate, not a measurement: it assumes the defect's resistance stays constant and that the heat comes only from Joule heating. Many procedures apply the correction only above roughly 40% of rated load and always document both values, measured and corrected.

Example: a 400 A distribution panel

Fictional example. Ambient 25 °C, phase current 240 A on a 400 A breaker (60% of rated). Temperatures measured at the connection of breaker Q1: phase A 40 °C, phase B 41 °C, phase C 49 °C.

  1. Reference = average of phases A and B = (40 + 41) ÷ 2 = 40.5 °C.
  2. Measured ΔT = 49 − 40.5 = 8.5 °C (4 to 15 band: probable deficiency).
  3. Load factor = (400 ÷ 240)² = 2.78.
  4. Corrected ΔT = 8.5 × 2.78 = 23.6 °C (above 15: major).

The correction changes the decision from "next shutdown" to "act soon". The ΔT over ambient is 49 − 25 = 24 °C. The table summarizes three points on the same panel:

PointLoadMeasured ΔTFactorCorrected ΔTSeverity
Breaker Q1, phase C60%8.5 °C2.7823.6 °CMajor
Busbar joint90%12 °C1.2314.8 °CProbable (next shutdown)
Contactor K2, phase B80%2 °C1.563.1 °CPossible (reinspect)

The most common cause of these anomalies is an under-tightened or oxidized connection. The typical fix is to de-energize safely, clean, retighten to the specified torque and rescan under load to confirm that ΔT has dropped.

Advertisement

Where to apply it and how to integrate it

Put thermography routes into the maintenance plan, with frequency set by asset criticality (RCM and FMEA results show where it detects the failure mode). Record findings as work orders in the CMMS, closing the loop with reinspection. Thermography is a predictive maintenance technique, and historical ΔT data feeds AI predictive maintenance models. If the result calls for stopping the plant, the repair can go into the planned shutdown. For bearings and gears, cross-check with oil analysis.

A useful report has: visible and thermal photo of the same spot, asset ID, each phase's load, emissivity and reflected temperature used, measured and corrected ΔT, severity, recommended action and deadline.

Safety and competence

Inspecting an energized panel requires an electrical work procedure: follow your site's electrical safety program (NFPA 70E in the US) with qualified staff and PPE rated for arc-flash risk. Infrared inspection windows let you scan with the panel closed. Whoever interprets the images needs training and practice; ISO 18434-1 (general procedures) and ISO 18436-7 (personnel qualification) are the reference for the method and for thermographer training.

Common mistakes and limits

Frequently asked questions

What does thermography detect in maintenance?

Hot spots caused by abnormal electrical resistance, friction, misalignment, poor insulation and flow blockage.

Which ΔT is considered critical?

In NETA-style criteria, above 15 °C over a similar component under the same load is major. Each company should set its own limits in a procedure.

Do I need to correct ΔT for load?

It is advisable when the load is partial, multiplying by (rated I ÷ measured I)². It is an estimate and is usually applied above about 40% load.

Why does emissivity matter?

Because the camera converts radiation to temperature using that value. Polished metal has low emissivity, and with a wrong setting the reading comes out far below the real one.

Does thermography replace vibration analysis?

No, they are complementary. Thermography is strong on electrical systems and heat points; vibration detects mechanical defects before the bearing heats up.

How often should I inspect?

It depends on criticality and failure history. Many plants run an annual route on panels and a higher frequency on critical assets.

Advertisement

Sources

  1. ISO 18434-1: Condition monitoring and diagnostics of machines — Thermography — Part 1: General procedures.
  2. ISO 18436-7: Condition monitoring and diagnostics of machines — Requirements for qualification and assessment of personnel — Part 7: Thermography.
  3. InterNational Electrical Testing Association (NETA). Maintenance Testing Specifications for Electrical Power Equipment and Systems.
  4. HOLST, G. C. Common Sense Approach to Thermal Imaging. SPIE Press / JCD Publishing.
  5. MOBLEY, R. K. An Introduction to Predictive Maintenance. Butterworth-Heinemann.

Keep studying: trusted sources and links

Save this address: Manufatura Enxuta is your school for lean manufacturing. Come back whenever you need to study, with a complete article, a visual map and trusted sources. Follow one of the learning paths or check the A–Z glossary.

Want to measure what really matters?

Download the free e-book on performance indicators and track the losses in your operation.

Download the e-book
Photo of Vagner Soares

About the author

Vagner Soares

Lean Manufacturing & Behavioral Management Specialist

Over 20 years in the automotive and metalworking industries (GM and Dana), Lean Manufacturing practitioner since 2006. SENAI instructor and mentor in Brazil’s Brasil Mais Produtivo program, delivering consulting, training and audits for 50+ companies, combining quality, productivity and people development.